http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/08/08/edwards.affair/index.html

8/8/2008 5:04:50 PM

8/8/2008 5:05:32 PM

i agree

8/8/2008 5:05:58 PM

I loled

8/8/2008 5:07:58 PM

that's not an attractive woman.

8/8/2008 5:10:19 PM

She's not bad for 42.

8/8/2008 5:18:27 PM

she might not be bad for 42, but john edwards is a gd presidential candidate. he can do way better than 42.

8/8/2008 5:24:07 PM

true, i mean look at spitzer

8/8/2008 5:25:14 PM

Quote :

"true, i mean look at spitzer"

agreed

8/8/2008 5:29:56 PM

yes, but spitzer had to pay for his

big difference

8/9/2008 3:36:26 PM

"Let's bang out cancer"

8/9/2008 3:43:09 PM

that bitch is str8t hideous. not any better than Mrs. Edwards, but still. Oh, and she looks like a raging liberal hippie douche woman, too.

8/9/2008 4:15:44 PM

I mean you can't blame him, do you realize how much chemo lowers your sex drive?

8/11/2008 9:56:19 AM

i bet if he could fly and they found a way to make him find women attractive, their kid would be invincible

8/11/2008 10:01:15 AM

is she republican?

8/11/2008 11:16:09 AM