Quote :

"1. trolling 1710 up, 187 down Being a prick on the internet because you can. Typically unleashing one or more cynical or sarcastic remarks on an innocent by-stander, because it's the internet and, hey, you can. Guy: "I just found the coolest ninja pencil in existence." Other Guy: "I just found the most retarded thread in existence." "

what is your definition of troll? you guys seem to throw that word around quite often on this site. Anywhere else, calling someone a troll because they argue a point you don't agree with is trolling.

example

1.everyone is talking about x
2.someone comes in and presents a valid point on why x isn't valid
3.an actual troll comes in and doesn't argue any points but just calls person in 2 a troll

everyone doesn't do it but it seems to be quite common on this site from my experience.

A while back, a user i won't name warned me in a pm conversation that this site was crawling with assholes that like to troll new users and females and give them a hard time.

10/1/2009 10:58:40 AM

troll is another word for a person who lives in northern michigan below the U P.

10/1/2009 10:59:35 AM

ITS U

10/1/2009 11:00:42 AM

one who requires a toll as a requirement of entrance into that boy's hole

10/1/2009 11:03:49 AM

Day Man!!!

10/1/2009 11:04:33 AM

ur mom is a troll ooh burn!

10/1/2009 11:04:56 AM

A troll is someone that griefs other users for pleasure and serves no other purpose beyond sabotage.

[Edited on October 1, 2009 at 11:07 AM. Reason : -]

10/1/2009 11:07:17 AM

thanks to everyone who has reached out and given feedback. Its nice to know I'm not the only sane person on this site.

10/1/2009 10:56:05 PM

oh so transparent, mambagrl

you'd like to be seen as a troll, but really, you're just a moron

10/1/2009 11:27:31 PM

It's boy's soul. Artemis did clearly write soul.



[user]mambachick[/user] looks pretty hot. Girrrl, let me get them digits. What's this thread all about?

[Edited on October 1, 2009 at 11:38 PM. Reason : unnecessary commas ftl]

10/1/2009 11:37:34 PM

^^Kickstand is my hero

10/1/2009 11:50:01 PM

Quote :

"1.everyone is talking about x 2.someone comes in and presents a valid point on why x isn't valid"

In my experience of reading your posts, you haven't presented any valid points. Just your opinions.

10/1/2009 11:56:27 PM

support that claim with an example

10/2/2009 12:04:09 AM

Quote :

"support that claim with an example"

This thread: message_topic.aspx?topic=574530&page=1#13204957

And this quote from a diff thread:

Quote :

"I know this is the internet and you may just be joking but I really want to know what you are driving because unless its german, you have no room to talk. I'm not into the germans because of the overall look but germany makes the best cars. Mitsubishi'a japanese engineering is unmatched by anyone else besides germany. Its just in my opinion the car looks better than the ones made in Germany but they all come from a long lineage of engineering that pretty much took over the whole world. Pertaining to this conversation, nobody steals German cars...its too risky. So that leaves my car as the top target."

[Edited on October 2, 2009 at 12:10 AM. Reason : -]

10/2/2009 12:10:28 AM

10/2/2009 12:12:10 AM

lets inspect

Quote :

"nobody steals German cars"

lets check out a list of the most stolen cars in the us

Quote :

"Honda Civic (1995) Honda Accord (1991) Toyota Camry (1989) Ford F-150 (1997) Chevrolet C/K 1500 (1994) Acura Integra (1994) Dodge Ram Pickup (2004) Nissan Sentra (1994) Toyota Pickup (1988) Toyota Corolla (2007)"

0/10 german. 7/10 japanese.

Quote :

"Its just in my opinion"

pretty much covers my ass on everything else.

I often do bring opinons but I back my claims with evidence or facts unless its reasonably expected to be common knowledge.

10/2/2009 12:33:32 AM

Gah I don't know why I'm doing this...


You're focusing on the wrong parts, but that's my fault. I should have bolded them. Let me get a re-do.
1. germany makes the best cars
2. Mitsubishi'a japanese engineering is unmatched by anyone else besides germany
3. nobody steals German cars...its too risky
4. they all come from a long lineage of engineering that pretty much took over the whole world

1. Evidence of this?
2. Evidence of this?
3. Sure German cars may not get stolen, but you don't know why. A better explanation is that German cars are few and far between and that Japanese cars have flooded the market and are everywhere. (Although that still may not be why.)
4. Evidence of this?


[Edited on October 2, 2009 at 9:39 AM. Reason : -]

10/2/2009 9:37:32 AM

she's failing to follow through logically on every count.

10/2/2009 9:39:05 AM

1.mercedes, bmw, audi, vw- Is anybody going to try and put an argument for another country makes? I don't know of anyone who would. Maybe I'm wrong. Lets see.

2.Youre getting warmer here but show me an alternative. Japan's electronics and automobiles have lead the world in innovation and sales for a long time. Common knowledge no?

3.They also have tracking devices

4.ww2

10/2/2009 11:19:17 AM

1. asking for other options fails to logically conclude your point.

2. appeals to common knowledge fails to logically conclude your point. (relates to the one above)

3. you assume that other cars/makes do not have tracking devices and/or that every german car does have a tracking device erroneously which fails to logically conclude your point.

4. stating "WW2" provides more contrary/contradictory evidence (does not support and in fact weakens your point) which fails to logically conclude your point.

see the pattern of complete fail here?

10/2/2009 11:24:44 AM

japanese cars get stolen because there are so many of them so its easy to sell the parts from them

10/2/2009 11:28:23 AM

RAWR RAWR RAWR

10/2/2009 11:32:53 AM

1. You're on to something, except when I make a claim of something being the best suggesting an alternative would be the only way to refute it. Its a relative statement.

2.I don't have to logically conclude something thats common knowledge. If you want to refute it, fine, but I don't have to prove it.

3. Every German car doesn't have a tracking device but a large number do. Some Japanese cars have them but GTAers are simply playing the odds game.

4. Machines with Mercedees and Mitsubishi engines in particular gave the allies all kinds of trouble.

You aren't arguing with information. You aren't providing any information just claims like

Quote :

"provides more contrary/contradictory evidence (does not support and in fact weakens your point) which fails to logically conclude your point. "

but no examples of said evidence. No details to support your claims. No information at all. You are basically saying "hey! you're wrong" and thats it.

10/2/2009 11:42:19 AM

All I know is that mambagrl is really stupid and should just stop posting.

10/2/2009 11:47:14 AM

^^ exactly, that's all i intended to do, basically i don't have to disprove your failings, they disprove themselves

10/2/2009 11:54:07 AM

Quote :

"one who requires a toll as a requirement of entrance into that boy's hole"

evan bringing the lolz itt

Quote :

"what is your definition of troll?"

mambagrl

Quote :

"support that claim with an example"

from Sports Talk:

Quote :

"everyone already knows Glennon has more pro potential than Wilson and we're just waiting to see it on the field before making that declaration. As a matter of fact, TOB put Glennon into the game when Wilson was struggling."

That is a troll statement because:
1) your statement had no evidence or facts
2) Glennon was scheduled to go in at specific parts of each game and he did, unless we were up by a ridiculous score so playing Wilson was unnecessary (just ask Tim Tebow how unnecessary). His presence in any game has had nothing to do with "Wilson struggling"
3) it is the only negative statement towards RW in the thread, and who the fuck says anything negative about RW without intentionally trying to get on everyone's nerves?

You are indeed a troll.

You are trolling by the simple creation of this thread...and being an attention whore.

[Edited on October 2, 2009 at 11:59 AM. Reason : -]

10/2/2009 11:57:08 AM

Quote :

"1) your statement had no evidence or facts "

Is Glennon getting playing time in the first half of the first game of the season while trailing 7-0 not evidence to him having a lot of upside? Is it not evidence that TOB saw he was very formidable in practice relative to Wilson to actually PLAN to insert him into an undecided game?

Many expect Wilson to leave football after this year because his pro potential has a relatively low ceiling.

Quote :

"His presence in any game has had nothing to do with "Wilson struggling""

You say that but Wilson was struggling and he came in but its mighty funny he never came in while any other game was this close and Wilson was tearing it up in those games.

Quote :

"3) it is the only negative statement towards RW in the thread, and who the fuck says anything negative about RW without intentionally trying to get on everyone's nerves?"

Really? I said something negative about Russel Wilson? Show me where. I said that he was struggling but that is simply stating a fact. Wilson struggled vs south carolina. Thats not tearing him down at all.

The worst part is that you don't even understand the context of the statement. The dude brought up Russel Wilson-Glennon, not me.

[Edited on October 2, 2009 at 12:33 PM. Reason : look at the definition of a troll V is trolling. calling me a troll is trolling. posting pics is...]

10/2/2009 12:31:13 PM

:carl face:

10/2/2009 12:31:38 PM

Quote :

"Is Glennon getting playing time in the first half of the first game of the season while trailing 7-0 not evidence to him having a lot of upside? Is it not evidence that TOB saw he was very formidable in practice relative to Wilson to actually PLAN to insert him into an undecided game?"

God I hate feeding trolls...but have to respond to this.

TOB actually said pre-game that he wanted to put Glennon in for a couple series in the 2nd quarter, regardless of Wilson's play....just to get him some PT and experience. The fact that he pulled him after one series shows that he DIDN'T have confidence in his ability at that time and wanted Wilson back in ASAP.

10/2/2009 12:33:19 PM

^I was just about to post the exact same thing.

^^^IIRC, TOB specifically had announced Glennon would start the first drive of the second quarter. Which he did. It was no surprise to anyone. The entire team was off that entire game...it was mainly the receivers struggling (there were so many good passes dropped that game) and the play calling not allowing Wilson to run the ball. So no, Wilson was not struggling, yet you are calling him out. If Wilson was really struggling and Glennon is such a beast, then why didn't TOB send Glennon in for any other part of that entire game?

I apologize to everyone for bringing a Sports Talk debate into Chit Chat, but mambagrl needs to be put in her place.

[Edited on October 2, 2009 at 12:41 PM. Reason : ^]

10/2/2009 12:39:40 PM

Quote :

"TOB specifically had announced Glennon would start the first drive of the second quarter"

Why did TOB plan this though? Thats the whole part you're missing. This isn't rec league where he tries to make everyone happy. The only way this type of thing would be planned at this level is if someone has high potential.

Quote :

"So no, Wilson was not struggling"

12/23 74 yards passing
11 carries (-17) yards

riiiight

[Edited on October 2, 2009 at 12:51 PM. Reason : only 3 more balls should have been caught 2 of which were in double coverage]

[Edited on October 2, 2009 at 12:52 PM. Reason : 57 yards in a whole game aint strugglin]

10/2/2009 12:49:10 PM

this is a pretty lol thread http://thewolfweb.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=568785&page=1

10/2/2009 1:02:36 PM

your arguments are all purely your opinion, there is nothing substatial supporting them in any way, yet you continue to make absurd declarations and statements.

label ---> TROLL

let it be known and finished to all.

10/2/2009 2:03:17 PM

^^^to get him game experience lest he have none if russell went down.

read some of his damn press quotes prior to the SCar game. he said it at least 10 times.

[Edited on October 2, 2009 at 2:20 PM. Reason : ^^^]

10/2/2009 2:20:05 PM

Quote :

"STIR THE POT"

10/2/2009 2:51:23 PM

Quote :

"Why did TOB plan this though?"

clearly because he doesn't want to be put in the position of something happening to Wilson and then having to put in a QB who has never taken a college snap. This should be common knowledge for anyone who claims to be as smart as you. Can we start a petition to ban girls from sports talk?

10/2/2009 2:55:35 PM

Quote :

"4. Machines with Mercedees and Mitsubishi engines in particular gave the allies all kinds of trouble."

pwnt hard by T34s and P51s.

10/2/2009 3:12:12 PM

Is it too late to come in and play tww nice guy and offer sweet romance to OP?

10/2/2009 3:13:39 PM

Quote :

"clearly because he doesn't want to be put in the position of something happening to Wilson and then having to put in a QB who has never taken a college snap."

absurd. no coach plays "get the young guys some experience" while trailing 7-0 in the first half of a huge game vs a big time opponent on national television. Especially when theres two FCS games coming up.

Quote :

"your arguments are all purely your opinion"

really? most football knowers wouldn't tell you 54 yards by a qb in a whole game (-one drive) isn't struggling? they would find it normal for a coach to get the bench warmers experience during the first half of the season opener vs usc while trailing by 7? they would claim the collective car companies of another country rival those of germany? really?

10/2/2009 3:23:11 PM

Seriously, get out. Never come back.

10/2/2009 3:23:34 PM

block user was the best invention ever. troll can't get me!

10/2/2009 3:30:37 PM

I blocked bmel

10/2/2009 3:31:45 PM

TOB had already said Glennon would get some playing time vs the cocks.

Quote :

"1. You're on to something, except when I make a claim of something being the best suggesting an alternative would be the only way to refute it. Its a relative statement."

No it isn't, but in that case:

America makes the best cars
Japan makes the best cars
Italy makes the best cars
Britain makes the best cars
France makes the best cars
Korea makes the best cars

There, I provided 6 alternatives, your argument should be thoroughly refuted

10/2/2009 3:39:20 PM

IT IS WELL KNOWN THAT THE FORMER CZECHOSLOVAKIA MADE THE BEST CARS.

10/2/2009 3:45:27 PM

Quote :

"most football knowers"

yeah, you're a fool pretty much, and your opinions are foolish as well (and not the good fool meaning either)

10/2/2009 4:17:43 PM

Quote :

"No it isn't, but in that case: America makes the best cars Japan makes the best cars Italy makes the best cars Britain makes the best cars France makes the best cars Korea makes the best cars There, I provided 6 alternatives, your argument should be thoroughly refuted"

what are you talking about?

10/2/2009 8:26:59 PM

What are you talking about?

10/2/2009 8:50:21 PM

your post not making sense

10/2/2009 9:10:47 PM

If it really upsets you, just stop posting like you have been in the past. Change it up.

10/2/2009 9:48:20 PM

Quote :

"absurd. no coach plays "get the young guys some experience" while trailing 7-0 in the first half of a huge game vs a big time opponent on national television. Especially when theres two FCS games coming up."

Except when your star QB has gotten hurt multiple time already within the last year, and you don't want to risk not having an experienced back up.

10/5/2009 6:00:43 PM