whats up with the bucket?

10/1/2009 4:39:14 PM

10/1/2009 4:40:12 PM

i didnt get to see any of the responses to the other one. No idea what happened to it.

10/1/2009 4:40:25 PM

Didn't he get a thread removed because his not completed website was posted?

10/1/2009 4:44:28 PM

Yeah. He is a TA, so his identity is known. We know who he is. He is in the public. Yet, if you post any personal information (and you'd think a public website wouldn't be personal) he goes apeshit and demands suspensions and thread deleting and that sort of thing.

I kinda wonder what he would do if someone posted a pic of him. As much as he talks about appearances, it's only fair that the rest of the group knows what he looks like so we can judge.

Is there any disagreement on that point?

I know someone here has pics of old balls.

Lets see em.

10/1/2009 7:56:56 PM

I've met him twice.

very nice guy, despite his politics. not THAT old. old for TWW? sure. but not that old.

I'd guess early 40s.

10/1/2009 7:58:45 PM

So basically he isn't nearly as reageful in real life as online?

10/1/2009 10:40:10 PM

say what?

10/2/2009 12:20:04 AM

[Edited on October 2, 2009 at 12:29 AM. Reason : wat]

10/2/2009 12:29:23 AM

I've apparently had "encounters" with him. Also, I helped another TWWer write some stuff for the Technician back in the day and he would actually send in letters criticizing the grammatical choices. Really stupid picky stuff too, like "you need to use x instead of y". I wonder if he knew that those letters go to the people who write the articles, not just some editor-cloud in the netherworld.

Where's his site?

Oh yeah, and once I mentioned his age in a thread where he was dishing out a bunch of crazy criticisms and he flew off the handle and sent me this really angry long PM, as if I'd tried to burn down his house or something. Classic example of someone who loves to dish it but can't even take the smallest jab.

[Edited on October 2, 2009 at 8:31 AM. Reason : .]

10/2/2009 8:29:25 AM

gelatoid.com

It guarantees this thread will be taken down.

And he is 43.

ah hah

http://www.technicianonline.com/2.4482/campus-forum-january-22-2007-1.1108213

Quote :

"Stop using 'stiff elements' Please inform certain Technician writers that "in regards [sic] to" is incorrect. In addition, even "regarding," "in regard to," and "with regard to" lack ease and grace. Writers should use "concerning," "about," or "for" instead of these stiff elements. Jeff Dalton Graduate Student, Liberal Studies "

[Edited on October 2, 2009 at 9:17 AM. Reason : .]

10/2/2009 9:13:37 AM