In a London courtroom in July 2008, Procter & Gamble lawyers successfully argued against Keiron Williams that Pringles are not crisps, even though it says "Potato Crisps" on the container, as their actual potato content is only 42%. This exempts Pringles from the 17.5% Value Added Tax for potato chips and potato-derived snacks.[18] The Court of Appeal, however, has reversed the tribunal's decision. A spokesperson for Procter & Gamble stated that they have been paying the Value Added Tax protectively and therefore will not owe back taxes.[19][20]Good to know wikipediaThis has been an AstralAdvent presentation.
11/5/2010 4:28:49 PM
wat
11/5/2010 4:30:38 PM
11/5/2010 4:31:07 PM
hmph.I had no idea that P&G owned Pringles.
11/5/2010 4:34:13 PM
I assume P&G owns anything food product that can be prepared and consumed within 30 minutes of purchaseI'm AstralAdvent and i approved this message.
11/5/2010 4:41:01 PM
P&G pretty much owns everything
11/5/2010 4:41:31 PM
That goes for GE as well...
11/5/2010 4:42:42 PM
You mean general mills?I'm AstralAdvent and i approved this message.
11/5/2010 4:44:45 PM
Oh, and Honeywell.They make home thermostats and the turbines for blackhawks. And they help make nuclear warheads apparently.
11/5/2010 4:48:43 PM
oh gg i thought agcraw was responding to what i saidI'm AstralAdvent and i approved this message.
11/5/2010 4:49:49 PM
I think Pringles' initial intention was to make tennis balls. But on the day that the rubber was supposed to show up, a big truckload of potatoes arrived. But Pringles was a laid-back company. They said "Fuck it. Cut 'em up."
11/5/2010 4:53:29 PM
i too know that jokeI'm AstralAdvent and i approved this message.
11/5/2010 4:54:19 PM
11/6/2010 8:41:39 AM
So what the hell else is in pringles?
11/6/2010 10:33:48 AM
^ you DONT want to know. Damn that was a fat cheerleader.
11/6/2010 10:41:04 AM