http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2011/0726/Wealth-gap-widens-Whites-net-worth-is-20-times-that-of-blacks
7/26/2011 7:40:26 PM
I thought history pretty much taught us that already, do we need to be funding studies on this?
7/26/2011 7:41:23 PM
So you're saying blax wouldn't beg for more money and shit if they were already making a fuck ton of it?
7/26/2011 7:42:49 PM
I guess they DID spread like a disease throughout Europe, Eurasia, Australia, North America, and South Africa, so we pretty much knew this already.Who knows what would have happened if Ghandi didn't put his foot down.
7/26/2011 7:43:39 PM
I'm an asshole but it has nothing to do with my income. It just comes naturally. Its the only thing I'm good at without even trying.
7/26/2011 7:47:30 PM
7/26/2011 7:48:45 PM
7/26/2011 7:57:58 PM
This is largely due to property ownership. It doesn't reflect much on income, just how white people are more prone to be investing in property(mortgage) instead of grape soda, fried chicken and Ludacris albums.
7/26/2011 8:03:45 PM
I'd just like to point out that the disparities in median income aren't anywhere close to this bad. ~30% vs ~2000%.
7/26/2011 8:10:06 PM
I think this may be because they reproduce like rabbits and can't afford to send any of their kids to college.
7/26/2011 8:13:13 PM
Statistically speaking, black people make shitty financial decisions
7/26/2011 8:17:21 PM
Statistically speaking, what's wrong with being an asshole?
7/26/2011 8:24:05 PM
White people don't have raised buicks with huge rims and a custom sound system
7/26/2011 8:25:44 PM
Statistically speaking, I have an asshole
7/26/2011 8:28:15 PM
umm, old?message_topic.aspx?topic=615415
7/26/2011 8:46:48 PM
Statistically speaking, http://www.google.com/trends?q=ass%2C+hole
7/26/2011 8:47:34 PM
Statistically speaking, this thread is racist against several races. [Edited on July 26, 2011 at 8:51 PM. Reason : or does statistically speaking cancel out the racism? that is my theory.]
7/26/2011 8:50:39 PM
7/26/2011 8:52:19 PM
Statistically speaking, the OP is gay.
7/26/2011 8:52:47 PM
7/26/2011 8:55:56 PM
7/26/2011 8:57:24 PM
Facts != Statistics
7/26/2011 8:57:54 PM
made it to bbc. some more cool stats from the study:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/14296246
7/26/2011 8:58:51 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GlKL_EpnSp8#t=01m40s
7/26/2011 9:04:45 PM
Screw art, just find a way to undermine the system and take advantage of the less well off!
7/26/2011 9:07:01 PM
Statistically speaking, it looks like some ethinic groups did not diversify their retirement funds
7/26/2011 9:14:48 PM
hmmm.... black people.... etc....[Edited on July 26, 2011 at 9:18 PM. Reason : ,]
7/26/2011 9:18:04 PM
7/26/2011 10:21:50 PM
Yeah, our stupid economic system deincentivizes art, entertainment and incentivizes buying things to keep other people from getting them so the less fortunate can pay you more money than you deserve for buying up all the things that people needed. Most people will just think I'm talking out of my ass or don't understand how this world works but really all I've done is paused and took a second to think about how stupid this shit is at the end of the day.It makes more economic sense to buy 3 houses and charge people extra to live in the other two than to just buy one house for you to live in and put art in. If you think about it it makes no sense for anyone to own more than what they use. [Edited on July 26, 2011 at 10:29 PM. Reason : if everyone bought in to my philosophy, we'd have a perfect world. ]
7/26/2011 10:27:39 PM
i propose we raise welfare and disability to even this junk out!
7/26/2011 10:30:59 PM
7/26/2011 10:41:18 PM
7/26/2011 10:44:07 PM
buy landthey will never make any more of it
7/27/2011 12:00:21 AM
incentivize is a word?
7/27/2011 12:00:38 AM
Simpsons did it
7/27/2011 12:06:51 AM
ain't my fault those niggs and wetbacks weren't born white.
7/27/2011 12:08:02 AM
Land ownership is silly concept in itself. Unless of course you were going to somehow mandate that everyone owns the land they dwell on. Think about it. How can you own land? You buy it? Who do you buy it from? How do they own it? What did they do to own it? Why can't you do the same? Its quite an idiotic concept.
7/27/2011 12:08:27 AM
^^ It actually is if you choose not to bang their mothers...[Edited on July 27, 2011 at 12:08 AM. Reason : CHRIS]
7/27/2011 12:08:33 AM
We learn that wolfpackgrrr dated a black guy ITT.
7/27/2011 12:15:56 AM
^she always brings that up and probably knows a handful of black people but feels like the authority on black people since she fucked one way back when. Really delusional character.
7/27/2011 12:31:42 AM
I'm such a dick.
7/27/2011 12:42:12 AM
ITT The E Man struggles with 17th century philosophy
7/27/2011 12:43:05 AM
RACIST THREAD IS RACIST
7/27/2011 12:43:46 AM
solution: Wu Tang Financial? [Edited on July 27, 2011 at 12:47 AM. Reason : You need to diversity your bonds, nigga.]
7/27/2011 12:47:22 AM
WE WON WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
7/27/2011 12:48:00 AM
Wow, this is amazing!hispanics are making more than blacks!
7/27/2011 12:48:26 AM
Well, they DO work harder *rimshot*
7/27/2011 12:49:41 AM
7/27/2011 12:51:19 AM
7/27/2011 1:55:13 AM
Just a theory I've considered when thinking about why the income disparity exists in America.White people have been building up equity since they arrived in America. Blacks have been building up equity since 1964. So whites have had several hundred years in which they have passed on their wealth, while most blacks in their 20-30s now have yet to receive an inheritance when the playing field was level.I think the disparity will be much smaller in 200 years, as whites will pay the leadership penalty and blacks will be secondary beneficiaries - i.e. they'll copy what whites have done, and the wealth gap will quickly shrink.The greatest inhibitor to race relations in the United States is when blacks demand to have the same wealth that whites who have had a 200 year headstart have. We can't change history, and with the advantages that minorities have enjoyed since 1964, the path to a much smaller gap has been revealed.I'm sure some of you will just say I'm a racist because I'm not selling all of my possessions and giving the proceeds to the first black person I see, but that's not correct. It's a problem that can't be fixed overnight. I'd have a problem if we still operated under separate but equal or any other type of discriminatory practices. I have no problem with allowing previously discriminated-against groups being allowed to run the race without interference. I have a serious problem with allowing them to only have to run a much smaller distance, albeit with the same end rewards.
7/27/2011 2:35:42 AM