RAWKUS CAUCUS
1/4/2008 8:41:22 AM
Say It Loud: I’m Running for President and I’m Proud!
1/4/2008 8:44:48 AM
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/politics/2008/01/04/sosa.iowa.caucus.wrap.cnn
1/4/2008 8:45:51 AM
chuck motherfucking norris
1/4/2008 8:47:34 AM
1/4/2008 8:52:02 AM
1/4/2008 8:54:12 AM
1/4/2008 9:20:12 AM
so what if its 95 percent whiteit was all the men and all the young women
1/4/2008 9:22:47 AM
^^^ ]
1/4/2008 9:23:35 AM
nagger v. cunttough decision
1/4/2008 9:26:14 AM
i choose neither
1/4/2008 9:26:40 AM
I said "BROS BEFORE HOES" as a joke because of the t-shirt at tshirthell.comAnd It doesn't surprise me with all the
1/4/2008 9:32:04 AM
1/4/2008 9:33:25 AM
haha, what does that have to do with black people voting?
1/4/2008 9:34:59 AM
This thread isn't about black people voting - if you want to go on a dumb-ass racist rant, make another thread
1/4/2008 9:40:28 AM
1/4/2008 9:41:32 AM
or potentially post in soap box?
1/4/2008 9:41:36 AM
I'd like someone to explain why black people won't vote for the Democratic candidate because he isn't black enough.He's Democratic, hell Gore got 92% of the black vote. Ninety fucking two. Kerry got 89%. Tell me black people won't vote for him, and won't vote for him en masse.[Edited on January 4, 2008 at 9:43 AM. Reason : if he's the nominee of course.]
1/4/2008 9:42:45 AM
it was just an offhand comment, but i didn't see any connection between what he said and what i said--and when have i ever gone on a "dumb-ass racist rant" terp[Edited on January 4, 2008 at 9:48 AM. Reason : oic]
1/4/2008 9:43:42 AM
^ sorry fecal, i wasn't really directing that to you - more to the direction of this thread
1/4/2008 9:46:50 AM
1/4/2008 9:47:11 AM
1/4/2008 9:49:15 AM
oh that's great. vote for whoever someone tells you to vote for. real genius
1/4/2008 9:51:09 AM
^^ Which promotes monolithic voting. The irony is that the Democratic party has been able to take the black vote for granted since the 1960s, effectively limiting the effect black voters will have on policy after the primaries. They won't go for the Republican party (which wrote them off after Nixon) and they can't form a viable third party at the national level. They would have to throw at least one presidential election for the Democrats before anyone would start to listen.I think race is also a very valid topic when referring to Obama. If he were white, he wouldn't even be considered as a presidential candidate. Sure he's charismatic and intelligent, but there are hundreds of charismatic, intelligent, young democratic politicians.]
1/4/2008 9:52:00 AM
Even the idiots on TV say blacks aren't voting for Obama because he isn't "black enough"I haven't heard 1 black person ever say that, it's bullshit. It isn't about his race, they're voting on issues.
1/4/2008 9:55:40 AM
1/4/2008 9:56:51 AM
People underestimate the number of southern blacks who have been voting republican for the past few elections because of the moral issues and their churches.That shit needs to stop!
1/4/2008 10:00:17 AM
no, democrats suck
1/4/2008 10:00:45 AM
Republicans are evil
1/4/2008 10:01:23 AM
1/4/2008 10:01:57 AM
ahahhahaha. that's the funniest bs i've heard in a while.democrats are thieves, hypocritical, make no sense, have no common sense, etc, etc, etc
1/4/2008 10:02:07 AM
1/4/2008 10:02:42 AM
1/4/2008 10:03:32 AM
1/4/2008 10:04:58 AM
Republicans think they're slick, but they're just a bunch of Arab murderers, committing genocide under the cloak of "a war on terror"Not only that, they act like they're so fiscally responsible - but they wasted billions of dollars on a war... much of which was funnelled back into corporations that THEY OWN to rebuild the countries that they destroy.
1/4/2008 10:05:34 AM
too bad its arabs who are killing innocent people. maybe that's why we waged war on some of them? it's not like we're going around shooting any arab. that is wrong. however, killing terrorists and dismantling their organizations and political/government allies is not wrong.and if I remember correctly, DEMOCRATS VOTED FOR ALL OF THIS TOO.spain bombings, london bombings, london terror plots, suicide bombers in middle eastern countries, wtc, pentagon, uss cole, etc, etc, etc. do these have any meaning to you?[Edited on January 4, 2008 at 10:10 AM. Reason : .]
1/4/2008 10:07:20 AM
^^ Democrats went along for political expediency, thats not really any better, and while Republicans are typically the bigger hawks, don't think that Democrates don't have their hands military-industrial complex pot-o-goodies.^ If you don't think that large portions of the Right don't view Arabs as sub-human you're wrong. I don't think it is a deliberate racism, but its always easier to kill someone you can distance yourself from and race makes that easy. There was no real connection between Saddam and al Quaida, the invasion of Iraq had been in the works since 1993, September 11th was just a convenient excuse.]
1/4/2008 10:07:32 AM
1/4/2008 10:12:51 AM
Sure some people view arabs as sub-human, but you can't call that a republican thing.
1/4/2008 10:12:57 AM
1/4/2008 10:14:29 AM
too bad the people we killed were not random arabs, but those involved in or directly supported the murdering of innocent people and yes, i know what the u.s. has been doing, and I have no problem with it. If these people weren't killing innocent citizens of countries around the world then our OGA's wouldn't need to be in covert ops in their country[Edited on January 4, 2008 at 10:17 AM. Reason : .]
1/4/2008 10:16:21 AM
1/4/2008 10:18:34 AM
sure there are civilian casualties. but not as many as you think. when these governments report that innocent people were killed in a U.S. bombing, many times they are not innocent, but the government is using their death as propaganda. not to mention, many schools in this region are teaching children to hate the u.s. thus these children don't hate the u.s. for killing their father, who was probably supportive or a terrorist himself, but had it instilled in them as a child from their schoolwell i hate to run, but I have things to do. besides I don't think you'll ever smarten up and consider the details that you conveniently choose to forget. continue with your conspiracy theories and such garbage, just please keep your mouth shut so you don't convert others to your radical view [Edited on January 4, 2008 at 10:25 AM. Reason : .]
1/4/2008 10:21:12 AM
^there are so many dumb assumptions in that posts it's funny
1/4/2008 10:23:27 AM
Even though he was booed, Ron Paul got it right when he said American foreign policy played a big role in September 11th. That kind of thing doesn't happen just by accident and the problem is that, by nature of it being "foreign" policy, the majority of Americans aren't abreast of what really happens.The heavy-handed policy of the cold-war works when engaged in an economic war with a nation-state and its satellites who are linked by a common (if forced) ideology. It doesn't work when dealing with a organization like al Quaida or a country like Iraq.
1/4/2008 10:25:17 AM
^^ there is one assumption [Edited on January 4, 2008 at 10:26 AM. Reason : ^]
1/4/2008 10:25:56 AM
Iraq was a largely moderate Arab nation with no particular ill will to the US, as evidence by the broad-based public support, or at least ambivalence, to the invasion in 03. There is a reason things have changed.[Edited on January 4, 2008 at 10:28 AM. Reason : I'm done going off on tangents unrelated to Obama though. ]
1/4/2008 10:27:27 AM
^ except for the governmentkthxbai
1/4/2008 10:28:28 AM
1/4/2008 10:30:36 AM
spoken like a true democrat. gg.
1/4/2008 10:32:18 AM