yo Ryan... lets get Rymn-N-Garfunkel back together and do this shit on the 16th
7/8/2008 12:03:33 AM
man that band is horrible.
7/8/2008 12:04:36 AM
"gravely offended"?i'd also say you're a little touchy. i'm not offended in the least.just, ya know, telling you you might be a little off with your synopsis.hell, zeppelin dropped their shit in 1980. i'd bet about 85% of the clowns on this site were BORN after that year. so, in essence, liking them is almost homage to retro. i get what you're saying. i'm just saying it'd have to apply to zeppelin in this case as well.
7/8/2008 12:04:37 AM
I certainly do my fair share of bitching about new movies and some new albums and such, but to say Led Zeppelin and shit like that is overrated is fucking beyond retarded...
7/8/2008 12:05:17 AM
Masquerade is always begging for bands to play the opener slots...
7/8/2008 12:05:25 AM
I don't feel like I was ever excluding Zeppelin from that, but you'd probably agree that they're more contemporary than The Beatles are in their sound and style.
7/8/2008 12:06:06 AM
they'll have to beg people to go to that show.
7/8/2008 12:06:53 AM
I was borned 51 weeks before Coda
7/8/2008 12:06:54 AM
I love how they dont even name Max's son
7/8/2008 12:07:33 AM
yes, of course i agree with that. but your initial argument wholly implied that the reason people opt for zeppelin over the beatles is because of their 12-15 year margin of relevance, when none of us were around for either. hell, there are tons of bands now who rip the general sound of the beatles....every bit as many as zeppelin.retro and nostalgia are ALWAYS in. they just shift in areas of concentration.
7/8/2008 12:10:00 AM
I nostalgic for Joel's stinkhole
7/8/2008 12:12:04 AM
http://www.myspace.com/officialgorgeousfrankensteinalmost as bad as led zeppelin.
7/8/2008 12:12:15 AM
Well I would say that The Beatles definitely sound older than Led Zeppelin and that is a reason why some people don't like them. I mean, if you took a poll of people who didn't like The Beatles I bet around 20% would say because they're "too old." Significantly less would probably say that for Zeppelin.
7/8/2008 12:12:40 AM
Those dudes totally ripped off the Misfits
7/8/2008 12:13:49 AM
^^^ If you can't hear a discernible difference between them and Led Zeppelin then you're a fucking moron.
7/8/2008 12:14:28 AM
i bet you'd also find that the general demographic who didn't like the beatles as opposed to zeppelin would be people who were into modern, heavier rock music.same goes for if you asked a general demographic of folks who opted for more poppy, sing-songy jams.depends on the group of folks, and tastes have been polar among people for decades.^leave him be...ryan just really, really hates led zeppelin [Edited on July 8, 2008 at 12:17 AM. Reason : asfdasfd]
7/8/2008 12:16:30 AM
this kids almost as stupid as his beard.
7/8/2008 12:17:41 AM
^^ I believe we've come to about the same general understanding.^ I'm not the one who compared one of the most successful bands of all time to a band that's clearly built on image and zero talent, fucktard.[Edited on July 8, 2008 at 12:19 AM. Reason : ]
7/8/2008 12:18:03 AM
now that I listen to it those guys really do sound almost exactly like Led Zeppelin
7/8/2008 12:19:44 AM
well, i think it's more about the appeal to aggressiveness vs. melody and harmony, as opposed to meer age. but i get ya. i mean, there were "heavy" bands in the early-mid 60's, too, but you won't hear an agro guy cite them as "too old".
7/8/2008 12:20:05 AM
wait what, zeppelin at the RBC Center on Friday?! son of a fucking bitch.....
7/8/2008 2:14:16 AM
7/8/2008 2:16:22 AM
I TOO HATE LED'S VOICEAND ENVY ZEPPELIN'S ABILITY TO PLAY GUITAR
7/8/2008 2:23:34 AM
i almost saw plant and krauss at bonnaroo. but I saw Broken Social Scene instead I think, I imagine BSS was much more enjoyable for me anyway.
7/8/2008 2:30:31 AM
7/8/2008 3:29:12 AM
7/8/2008 7:50:53 AM
i thought this thread was about zep
7/8/2008 8:05:50 AM