2

12/14/2009 3:11:16 PM

^^^I obviously agree since I didn't even comprehend H in your list of possible of scenarios.

I mean, a girl could do 1H1V by accident. That's not sex.

[Edited on December 14, 2009 at 3:12 PM. Reason : handjobs are funny.]

12/14/2009 3:11:30 PM

slave has be cracking the fuck up

12/14/2009 3:12:25 PM

Handjobs are like lunch dates in any relationship

Fine to start out with, but once you move on to dinner dates, you never go back to lunch

Its insulting

12/14/2009 3:14:00 PM

but it can be pretty cool when you aren't expecting to get any food and she shows up like "hey here's lunch"

12/14/2009 4:03:55 PM

handys are so jr. high.

before got over themselves and realized that bjs aren't that horrible

12/14/2009 4:05:08 PM

I'd argue that a pop in HJ once we were well into the intercourse phase of our relationship would be no more welcome than a door to door solicitor

12/14/2009 4:07:42 PM

Quote :

"nothing wrong with double teaming a chick"

i agree with the rule about tits having to be between the dicks. if she wants the ass to mouth the males should remain in the same position and the female should do the moving around.

Eiffel tower FTW. I am perhaps too gay to put my dick in the same hole as another dick. I think that it is actually bc i am not gay though.

12/14/2009 4:10:42 PM

hahaha at skifree

12/14/2009 4:11:00 PM

i mean, it's fine for foreplay, but a to-completeion-handy should be reserved for like, girls who get motion sickness but want to give a roadie

12/14/2009 4:11:33 PM

I'd like to again state my preference for "Michigan High 5" to be used in lieu of "Eiffel Tower"

Its much more anatomically correct

12/14/2009 4:12:03 PM

I can see your point, if that was all she did it would be pretty disappointing.

12/14/2009 4:12:31 PM

Michigan high five not as romantic

12/14/2009 4:12:48 PM

If it was romance I was after, I wouldn't bring another guy into the mix in the first place

12/14/2009 4:13:45 PM

there's not many things romantic about doublin' up on a broad

12/14/2009 4:13:51 PM

what about a chick that didn't touch your goods at all even after being months into the intercourse phase?

12/14/2009 4:14:00 PM

I wouldn't bring another guy into the mix in the first place

12/14/2009 4:14:22 PM

then she probably is a dead fish in the sack anyways

boorring

12/14/2009 4:14:38 PM

You mean just straight banging and no hand, mouth, or foot interaction ?

I'd be cool with that, with the stipulation that I didn't have to go down on her either

[Edited on December 14, 2009 at 4:16 PM. Reason : but like my colleague mentioned, it would get old...perhaps fun for a tryst, but nothing more]

12/14/2009 4:15:52 PM

^^seriously

I love it when a chick grabs my hard cock and eases it into herself.

[Edited on December 14, 2009 at 4:16 PM. Reason : ^]

12/14/2009 4:15:55 PM

Please refrain from posting graphic depictions like that, it ruins the tone of the thread

12/14/2009 4:18:05 PM

Quote :

"what about a chick that didn't touch your goods at all even after being months into the intercourse phase?"

lol

12/14/2009 4:18:36 PM

^^the way you represent yourself, it probably turned you on.

12/14/2009 4:19:35 PM

aroq just took this to another level

lol

12/14/2009 4:19:55 PM

Quote :

"I love it when a chick grabs my hard cock and eases it into herself."

12/14/2009 4:21:42 PM

This isn't literotica

Speak from a hypothetical; don't involve yourself directly in the action

12/14/2009 4:24:44 PM

i better not stand up from my desk for the next few minutes

12/14/2009 4:25:59 PM

^

12/14/2009 4:26:48 PM

Quote :

"aroq just took this to another level"

and it was good

12/14/2009 4:27:01 PM

^^^ i know right! my dick is pinning me down under my desk.

12/14/2009 4:27:29 PM

Jeepin...you stay right there! I'M ON MY WAY!!!

[Edited on December 14, 2009 at 4:27 PM. Reason : ^wait...sparky's closer ]

12/14/2009 4:27:32 PM

with that oddly descriptive post I knew he was hoping to turn some women on, and it was funny, but oddly it seems to have worked. well played.

12/14/2009 4:29:23 PM

I found it in poor taste

12/14/2009 4:30:14 PM

I wasn't hoping to turn anyone on, but I'll absolutely take credit for doing so.

Chicks love to hear what guys like. Turning guys on turns girls on.

12/14/2009 4:31:40 PM

I think we know which girls are into romance novels here now.

12/14/2009 4:31:43 PM

Quote :

"If it was romance I was after, I wouldn't bring another guy into the mix in the first place"

hahahah again

Quote :

"what about a chick that didn't touch your goods at all even after being months into the intercourse phase?"

oh that's so annoying when they never, ever take the lead and instigate things on their own. I'm cool with kinda having the lead in the bedroom, but I can't stand a pincushion with a pulse. I shouldn't have to ask for ____ or put your ____ on _____ every time. You're all grown up, do something to me. I'll probably like it. If not, I'll probably try it once, anyway. If not, I'm bigger and stronger than you and you can only make me so uncomfortable before I just stop you, so why not roll the dice and not have sex like a nun?

[Edited on December 14, 2009 at 4:33 PM. Reason : ]

12/14/2009 4:32:06 PM

I can talk dirty with the best of them (and I have 6 erotic stories "published" on various sites to prove it

I just thought it was a departure from the rest of the thread, and not something I appreciated

12/14/2009 4:33:21 PM

Quote :

"I wasn't hoping to turn anyone on, but I'll absolutely take credit for doing so. Chicks love to hear what guys like. Turning guys on turns girls on."

honestly, i dont see anything wrong with your original post. i didnt see it as being "romantic" and i don't read romance novels. have i flipped through them before to see what they're like? uh yea.

i mean, if someone is having cyber sex, isn't that how they talk to each other? maybe not? or use a web cam.

12/14/2009 4:33:44 PM

^^links or it didn't happen.

We need a literotica thread. I love that shit.

cybersex on the other hand, is kinda lame, IMO.

[Edited on December 14, 2009 at 4:34 PM. Reason : .]

12/14/2009 4:34:12 PM

^^^no one is interested in your incest erotica

[Edited on December 14, 2009 at 4:35 PM. Reason : add ]

12/14/2009 4:34:30 PM

I'll upload some this evening

12/14/2009 4:36:23 PM

Quote :

"cybersex on the other hand, is kinda lame, IMO."

it's only lame if you're getting some IRL and still need it.

12/14/2009 4:37:33 PM

^sort of agree. But, there is always that undersexed individual who would rather e-cheat than actually cheat. I can respect that somewhat.

\/ while true, I would guess that about 99% of cybersex takes place between individuals who will never meet IRL.

[Edited on December 14, 2009 at 4:45 PM. Reason : .]

12/14/2009 4:42:22 PM

cybersex does not mean that it is with somebody you are not already with. sometimes you are in a position that you can't be WITH them

12/14/2009 4:43:34 PM

i put on my robe and wizard hat

12/14/2009 4:44:18 PM

Quote :

"aroq just took this to another level"

Quote :

"and it was good"

agreed

12/14/2009 4:44:22 PM

to all my boos:

12/14/2009 4:46:11 PM

to all my boobs:

12/14/2009 4:46:40 PM

Quote :

"cybersex does not mean that it is with somebody you are not already with. sometimes you are in a position that you can't be WITH them"

exactly. that is more what i meant when i first brought it up.

chocolatervh btw, boo.

12/14/2009 4:47:32 PM

you oughta know
tonight is the night to let it go
put on a show
i wanna see how you lose control

/jay sean

12/14/2009 4:48:52 PM