obsolete sounds like too harsh of a word. as long as there is legal stuff/whatever gay folks are denied bc they can't get married, it can't be obsolete, imo.
11/27/2010 9:06:02 AM
This may sound odd, but I honestly think it simply looks good to get married in terms of career prospects. You seem more mature and responsible. It SHOULDN'T be that way, but by and large I think it is?Also, what was that quote from The Departed? Something like "Marriage is important to get ahead; lets people know you aren't a homo and that your dick works."[Edited on November 27, 2010 at 9:25 AM. Reason : and I definitely want the cliche married life with kids... whatever.]
11/27/2010 9:24:58 AM
Marriage isn't just obsolete, monogamy is. The sooner we realize our social/sexual norms are here to serve us (and not the other way around), the sooner we'll be able to revise them in ways that give everybody more liberty, happiness, fulfillment, etc. Until then we'll remain slaves to past necessity.
11/27/2010 12:30:22 PM
marriage is a normal stage of life. It like a degree or a first home. If your not married or at least engaged by 27, you fail at life. Anyone who disagrees is lying to themselves.
11/27/2010 12:34:18 PM
I mean I know you're a troll and everything but I wonder how many of those stupid ideas are actually yours
11/27/2010 12:35:25 PM
I wish people would just do whatever makes them happy. If you want to get married do it, if you want to be married AND fuck other people, do it as long as y'all in agreement, if you want to fuck whomever, whenever, then just dooooooooooooo it. And let the gays do it too for fucks sake.
11/27/2010 12:36:01 PM
my .02. i have been in a monogamous relationship for a while and about to get married. i don't really have an issue with monogamy, and it doesnt really effect me that much if i "can't" have sex with the cute guy in my class. i don't know...its just that the idea of polygamy is not that attractive to me. at all. i actually talked to cody about this once (youre probably not gonna believe this...) we were watchign a law and order where one man had three or four wives. and after thinking about it, i really didnt see the big deal. hell if cody wanted to i probably wouldn't see the big deal either, as long as i could get along with the other girls however i do NOT want 3 or more husbands/boyfriends what ever [Edited on November 27, 2010 at 12:39 PM. Reason : sdfsdafsa]
11/27/2010 12:39:00 PM
Sorry MCDanger, all my ideas are mine. I don't have a dirty, hipster cuntface manual to read off as a bible.When are you getting married?
11/27/2010 12:39:43 PM
Then do it if it'll make y'all happy.It wouldn't me. Unless I could do the same. I just like to go in halfsies lol
11/27/2010 12:40:41 PM
me?[Edited on November 27, 2010 at 12:41 PM. Reason : ^ and ^^?]
11/27/2010 12:40:58 PM
11/27/2010 12:41:47 PM
^ i realized that after reading your post more closely.and i agree [Edited on November 27, 2010 at 12:42 PM. Reason : ]
11/27/2010 12:42:19 PM
11/27/2010 12:42:35 PM
haha yeah, mine anyways. I'm basically saying do whatever makes you happiest. It doesn't affect me!Buuuuuuuuut on the same hand, I couldn't let my bf have other girlfriends unless I had boyfriends too. Why does he get to have all the fun? lol
11/27/2010 12:42:56 PM
^lol. see thats where i differ.i see no fun in having more than one partner. none at all.now if he wanted to, hell go on. just make sure shes not a bitch plz and we can all get along [Edited on November 27, 2010 at 12:44 PM. Reason : thankfully im pretty sure cody is in my same boat ]
11/27/2010 12:43:58 PM
lol then you rock. Pretty sure my bf is straight up monogamy though so it's never been a real issue. hahaah He says one is enough.
11/27/2010 12:45:59 PM
11/27/2010 12:47:22 PM
^^yeah cody is too.like i said though, we got into a serious discussion about it one night and that was the conclusion i came to.hell i surprised myself. [Edited on November 27, 2010 at 12:48 PM. Reason : ^]
11/27/2010 12:48:10 PM
11/27/2010 12:48:12 PM
11/27/2010 12:49:37 PM
^interesting.i don't really view sex as that important. and im glad i dont (just imo)
11/27/2010 12:51:23 PM
11/27/2010 12:52:27 PM
hmmmmm. you are correct good sir.
11/27/2010 12:54:16 PM
11/27/2010 1:00:46 PM
11/27/2010 1:03:22 PM
11/27/2010 1:08:44 PM
op, i have no idea why you included fatties in the original, but it made me laugh
11/27/2010 1:23:39 PM
all that means is that young people haven't been married long enough
11/27/2010 1:24:20 PM
50% is a lie:http://www.divorcereform.org/rates.html
11/27/2010 1:28:43 PM
yeah that site looks peer reviewed and reputable [Edited on November 27, 2010 at 1:31 PM. Reason : .]
11/27/2010 1:30:52 PM
Remember that for GGMon "peer reviewed" means review by a committee containing no greater than 4 teeth
11/27/2010 1:34:55 PM
11/27/2010 1:39:24 PM
NPR had an interesting talk about this a couple weeks ago: http://m.npr.org/news/front/130571843?start=30
11/27/2010 1:49:07 PM
Honestly, I blame my parents generation for setting the precedent saying that it's okay to throw in the towel and get re-married several timesBut I also blame our generation for being dumb enough to either mimic this behavior OR thinking it is somehow better prepared for marriage than previous generationsFor those who can make it work, congrats and I wish you the best. I just get sick of people getting all high and mighty because they have been married for few years.[Edited on November 27, 2010 at 1:57 PM. Reason : asdf]
11/27/2010 1:56:38 PM
Divorce probability decreases if the two marrying are over 25 years of agehave no money issueshave a post secondary degree
11/27/2010 2:14:01 PM
post secondary means any college degree right?this means secondary is high school....wth is a primary degree?
11/27/2010 2:16:47 PM
i don't think this kid has any idea of what hes talking about]
11/27/2010 2:22:45 PM
Naw, that's a pretty good rundown of the stats.
11/27/2010 2:44:39 PM