12/29/2009 2:06:14 AM
There is an inherant flaw in the conception of this art project. Rape, by definition, is not consentual sex. So there's no such thing as consentual rape. Just consentual sex. Therefore, anyone who chooses to view the project is consenting to sex and those sexual acts cannot be considered rape. Unless, of course, the viewer changes his/her mind in the middle of the exhibit.[Edited on December 29, 2009 at 2:08 AM. Reason : .]
12/29/2009 2:08:05 AM
I'ma start the "Get McDangerized Tunnel"That shit would be a work of art
12/29/2009 2:12:46 AM
12/29/2009 2:25:22 AM
^ that would probably work actually, and it would suck badly. It seems unlikely if you think it requires a hot feminist, but then you realize it only requires an ugly feminist and a hot crazy/impressionable woman, and it seems a lot more possible.
12/29/2009 9:38:44 AM
I know some pretty hot feministsThen again I don't live in the south
12/29/2009 9:39:35 AM
In college, I was president of State's chapter of NOW (National Organization for Women). There were tons of hotties in our club.
12/29/2009 10:43:45 AM
12/29/2009 10:50:55 AM
Are people still surprised that feminists can be hotor that chicks can be smartor that guys can cook?
12/29/2009 11:04:03 AM
12/29/2009 12:27:38 PM
^wow, really? She looks way hotter in that gif than IRL
12/29/2009 12:32:22 PM
^ No way. She's smoking in this clip. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3uqhalhTjY[Edited on December 29, 2009 at 12:50 PM. Reason : .]
12/29/2009 12:47:51 PM
you.... tonight....in the tunnel
12/29/2009 12:49:20 PM
12/29/2009 12:53:02 PM
TWW tunnel painting raping
12/29/2009 2:05:12 PM
I think Chuck Liddell should go through the tunnel and see what happens.
12/29/2009 6:22:13 PM