the next one better rock
12/26/2009 6:35:00 PM
blame it on george bush michael vick and that girl that wouldn't sleep with you
12/26/2009 6:36:54 PM
2010 is still part of this decade <_<
12/26/2009 6:37:43 PM
2000-20092010-2019depends on when you start your year
12/26/2009 6:38:27 PM
no. 2000 was not part of the 90s and 90 was not part of the 80s.
12/26/2009 6:38:49 PM
i prefer to use 1-10thus we are still in decade 2001-2010
12/26/2009 6:39:40 PM
mcfluffle you're wrong
12/26/2009 6:40:49 PM
if only the same thing could have multiple interpretations! i mean, really..
12/26/2009 6:44:02 PM
i'm talking about the decade encompassing 10 years from this coming new years if you're purposefully going to stick to being retarded, ok
12/26/2009 6:47:43 PM
wow.. mcfluffle is dumb
12/26/2009 7:05:12 PM
Eh, I had a pretty good decade.Moved through high school, college, and grad school... and into a nice jerb. Can't complain
12/26/2009 7:08:24 PM
The first year was not year 0. The first year was year 1. The first decade was year 1-10. Therefore we are still in the decade of 2001-2010.
12/26/2009 7:12:06 PM
i like to go from 2005-2014i still have plenty of time for my decade to improvesuckers
12/26/2009 7:15:16 PM
Obama is a commie.
12/26/2009 7:15:28 PM
for historical purposes decades are dated from 00-09hence when someone refers to the 20's its 1920-1929
12/26/2009 7:15:34 PM
That's only cause people who like history don't know how to count and they start at 0 and not 1.
12/26/2009 7:16:59 PM
decades arent about counting, its about grouping 10 years together into a reference point
12/26/2009 7:18:58 PM
^^^^^^decades are classified as 0-9 (still ten years) because the moment you go from 9-10 you add a new number in the tens place. additionally, in historic dating, ex. itd be like saying 1940 is part of the 1930s, which is clearly wrong and stupid[Edited on December 26, 2009 at 7:19 PM. Reason : damn posters]
12/26/2009 7:19:17 PM
NRR wins
12/26/2009 7:19:28 PM
it is to about counting. You put 10 years together to get a decade. So you gotta be able to count to 10. DUH!!!!![Edited on December 26, 2009 at 7:20 PM. Reason : ]
12/26/2009 7:20:05 PM
^^]
12/26/2009 7:20:10 PM
12/26/2009 7:20:47 PM
It's like people saying we were in the 21st century in the year 2000.
12/26/2009 7:21:41 PM
those people were correct
12/26/2009 7:22:02 PM
So a century is no longer 100 years long?
12/26/2009 7:23:25 PM
i thought you were all about some counting? clearly you need help
12/26/2009 7:24:36 PM
Year 100 was the last year of the first century. Year 200 was the last year of the 2nd century. Skip a few years. Year 1800 was the last year of the 18th century, 1900 the last year of the 19th century and 2000 the last year of the 20th century. 2100 will be the last year of the 21st century.
12/26/2009 7:26:02 PM
please dont teach your children that, you couldnt be more wrong so is 1990 part of the 80's to?i mean the title of the refernced era explains precisely what years are included, its really pretty easyin math you would be right, but this isnt math, this is historical classification[Edited on December 26, 2009 at 7:30 PM. Reason : .]
12/26/2009 7:29:47 PM
wow, sawahash is a moron
12/26/2009 7:31:38 PM
When I'm talking about the 90's I mean 1990-1999But when I say the 10th decade of the century I mean 1991-2000.^so is your face![Edited on December 26, 2009 at 7:34 PM. Reason : ]
12/26/2009 7:31:59 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decade
12/26/2009 7:34:43 PM
ha ha you must bored
12/26/2009 7:35:17 PM
bhahaa
12/26/2009 7:36:19 PM
i'm so fucking bored
12/26/2009 7:36:39 PM