User not logged in - login - register
Home Calendar Books School Tool Photo Gallery Message Boards Users Statistics Advertise Site Info
go to bottom | |
 Message Boards » » Which is more justified ? Page [1] 2, Next  
Mordecai
Veteran
209 Posts
user info
edit post

An athlete making $25 million per season or an actor/actress that makes $20-$25 million per picture. I generally lean towards the athlete due to the training and length of a season in comparison to filming a movie that usually takes about 3-4 months. Now don't get me wrong, I don't think either of them deserve to be paid nearly as much as they make but I somewhat feel its justified due to how much a team/company can make off of one individual. What do you think TWW ?

4/27/2010 7:13:44 PM

BlackDog
All American
15654 Posts
user info
edit post

actor/actress

4/27/2010 7:14:12 PM

bottombaby
IRL
21958 Posts
user info
edit post

Move this shit to the Soap Box.

4/27/2010 7:14:38 PM

Førte
All American
23525 Posts
user info
edit post

nothing justifies burning a cat. not even doom music.

4/27/2010 7:15:33 PM

SaabTurbo
All American
25459 Posts
user info
edit post

Definitely actor/actress son.

An athlete is fucking worthless and usually has shit for brains son.



At least a god damned actor/actress has the potential to contribute to art son. Fuck man, what the fuck kind of art is playing with a god damned ball? Sports fucking SUCK bitch.

4/27/2010 7:15:44 PM

BubbleBobble
BACK IN DA HIGH LIFE
115245 Posts
user info
edit post

DOOM music justifies everything

4/27/2010 7:16:02 PM

BlackDog
All American
15654 Posts
user info
edit post

DOOM music? Like the music in the PC game Doom?

4/27/2010 7:16:38 PM

TreeTwista10
Les Dewdisdog
149294 Posts
user info
edit post

both are the same

with each, they have enough people willing to spend enough money to justify it

4/27/2010 7:16:44 PM

BubbleBobble
BACK IN DA HIGH LIFE
115245 Posts
user info
edit post

yes BlackDog

pure mothafuckin magic DOOM MUSIC

4/27/2010 7:17:30 PM

khcadwal
All American
35165 Posts
user info
edit post

do actors and actresses even make $25mil per film?

i thought it was more like $15 for the really high paid ones.

4/27/2010 7:18:06 PM

BlackDog
All American
15654 Posts
user info
edit post

k just makin surez

4/27/2010 7:18:14 PM

TreeTwista10
Les Dewdisdog
149294 Posts
user info
edit post

people like Jim Carrey and Julia Roberts have been making (at least) $25 million a flick

Ryan Howard, a 1st Baseman for the Phillies recently signed a deal giving him $25 million a year

the numbers are a pretty good comparison for the sake of the thread

4/27/2010 7:18:59 PM

Mordecai
Veteran
209 Posts
user info
edit post

^yeah that is what prompted this thread, the Ryan Howard signing.

4/27/2010 7:21:51 PM

El Nachó
special helper
16370 Posts
user info
edit post

Why do people sometimes put a space between the end of a word and the question mark? Is that a foreign thing?

4/27/2010 7:22:08 PM

BubbleBobble
BACK IN DA HIGH LIFE
115245 Posts
user info
edit post

that's an NC86 thing bro

4/27/2010 7:23:07 PM

Kris
All American
36908 Posts
user info
edit post

<align="justify">

now that's justified

</align>

4/27/2010 7:23:34 PM

Optimum
All American
13716 Posts
user info
edit post

He's foreign

4/27/2010 7:23:36 PM

TreeTwista10
Les Dewdisdog
149294 Posts
user info
edit post

Why do people sometimes single space after a sentence? Or does TWW just auto-truncate it down to one space? Hmm.

[Edited on April 27, 2010 at 7:23 PM. Reason : yes TWW auto truncates, nm]

4/27/2010 7:23:44 PM

Kris
All American
36908 Posts
user info
edit post

u gotta put in the ampersand-nbsp-colons if u want moar than one space

4/27/2010 7:24:40 PM

TreeTwista10
Les Dewdisdog
149294 Posts
user info
edit post

Or I could do this.  But yeah.

4/27/2010 7:25:18 PM

Bweez
All American
10849 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"I somewhat feel its justified due to how much a team/company can make off of one individual. "


What?

Do you know how the movie industry works at all?

This is the same shit as stars carrying films, and those stars making the higher-ups money.

4/27/2010 7:53:14 PM

Spontaneous
All American
27372 Posts
user info
edit post

I think supply and demand is the most justified.

4/27/2010 8:05:14 PM

kiljadn
All American
44698 Posts
user info
edit post

NEDM ITT

4/27/2010 8:07:42 PM

AndyMac
All American
31924 Posts
user info
edit post

Isn't 20 million the generally accepted amount for the biggest names?

I heard somewhere that Depp is going to be making like $40 million for Pirates 4 though.

4/27/2010 8:08:23 PM

Spontaneous
All American
27372 Posts
user info
edit post

This question is too arbitrary and nebulous. What answer did you want Mordecai?

4/27/2010 8:16:49 PM

MrsCake
All American
1146 Posts
user info
edit post

That's like 100 times what I make in a school year.

4/27/2010 8:18:42 PM

Spontaneous
All American
27372 Posts
user info
edit post

You should go into acting or sports. Also, what do you teach that pay $250,000?

4/27/2010 8:22:10 PM

MrsCake
All American
1146 Posts
user info
edit post

I mean a thousand. I DON'T TEACH MATH.

4/27/2010 8:23:14 PM

TreeTwista10
Les Dewdisdog
149294 Posts
user info
edit post

^^hopefully not math lol

[Edited on April 27, 2010 at 8:23 PM. Reason : ^yeah haha you set yourself up for that one]

4/27/2010 8:23:46 PM

Spontaneous
All American
27372 Posts
user info
edit post

4/27/2010 8:24:46 PM

MrsCake
All American
1146 Posts
user info
edit post

WHATEVER, you're not giving credit to my point, which is THOSE ATHLETES AND MOVIE STARS ARE THE PEOPLE WHO SLACK OFF IN MY CLASS AND DO NOTHING AND DROP OUT OF SCHOOL SO THEY CAN GO ON FOR YEARS ABOUT TEACHERS WHO NEVER UNDERSTOOD THEIR CREATIVITY OR THEIR PROWESS ON THE FIELD/COURT WHEN REALLY THEY WERE LAZY AND ANNOYING MOST OF THE TIME ANYWAY.

...and everyone will sympathize, even though they make my job hell.

It's probably a good thing that I'm getting away from teaching for a while.

[Edited on April 27, 2010 at 8:26 PM. Reason : high school English]

4/27/2010 8:26:36 PM

TreeTwista10
Les Dewdisdog
149294 Posts
user info
edit post

they might make your job hell

and no disrespect to your profession

but when you have tens of thousands of people paying to watch you teach, then you can complain about their salary

4/27/2010 8:28:15 PM

Spontaneous
All American
27372 Posts
user info
edit post

I'll tutor you in math for $2.5*106 per session.

4/27/2010 8:31:24 PM

MrsCake
All American
1146 Posts
user info
edit post

^^I don't see how that's a valid comparison, or why it prevents me from complaining about their salary. Certain stars get paid vast amounts of money for terrible performances. Most people get fired for them.

^That is too much money. I think.

[Edited on April 27, 2010 at 8:32 PM. Reason : ]

4/27/2010 8:31:34 PM

Bweez
All American
10849 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"WHATEVER, you're not giving credit to my point, which is THOSE ATHLETES AND MOVIE STARS ARE THE PEOPLE WHO SLACK OFF IN MY CLASS AND DO NOTHING AND DROP OUT OF SCHOOL SO THEY CAN GO ON FOR YEARS ABOUT TEACHERS WHO NEVER UNDERSTOOD THEIR CREATIVITY OR THEIR PROWESS ON THE FIELD/COURT WHEN REALLY THEY WERE LAZY AND ANNOYING MOST OF THE TIME ANYWAY.

...and everyone will sympathize, even though they make my job hell.

It's probably a good thing that I'm getting away from teaching for a while."


What the hell are you talking about?

Many movie stars are very well educated.

4/27/2010 8:32:31 PM

TreeTwista10
Les Dewdisdog
149294 Posts
user info
edit post

^^Feel free to complain about it, because in theory you're doing something much more important than they are

But its a valid comparison because all the people who pay to watch a sporting event or movie are WHY they get paid so much...because people are willing to pay to be entertained by their movie/sporting event

4/27/2010 8:33:06 PM

Spontaneous
All American
27372 Posts
user info
edit post

A lot of professional league athletes are only pulling six figures and a lot of actors aren't paid at all. Don't feel too bad.

4/27/2010 8:34:16 PM

MrsCake
All American
1146 Posts
user info
edit post

^^^That's true. I recently watched the movie "Notorious" in which student Biggie Smalls harasses his teacher and tells him that garbage collectors make more than he does (true). It's just frustrating to me to have kids in my class who are convinced they're going to be famous and completely unwilling to work for it, and that actually works for some people. Also, I'm tired.

^^Point taken. I guess if people were willing to pay more for education, teachers would have higher salaries. It's always been something people have used as an example of skewed priorities, but it's all supply and demand, I guess.

[Edited on April 27, 2010 at 8:35 PM. Reason : ]

4/27/2010 8:35:37 PM

Mordecai
Veteran
209 Posts
user info
edit post

^^^this is exactly how i feel about the subject

4/27/2010 8:37:15 PM

TreeTwista10
Les Dewdisdog
149294 Posts
user info
edit post

keep working at it though if its something you love and are willing to deal with, pay-wise

besides, tenured college professors can make a nice chunk of change with good job security

4/27/2010 8:37:26 PM

MrsCake
All American
1146 Posts
user info
edit post

Although, back to the subject at hand: I don't think either salary is justified at that level, not with the standard of living that most celebrities enjoy compared to the average person's. But I might say that the salary:time ratio makes the original argument for athletes' pay somewhat more justified.

4/27/2010 8:42:10 PM

ALkatraz
All American
11299 Posts
user info
edit post

The premise of the question is incorrect. They are both justified because the athlete and actor get paid well to do something they're good at. The people who pay them are the people who collect ticket sales from us.

4/27/2010 9:31:01 PM

begonias
warning: not serious
19585 Posts
user info
edit post

short answer: athlete

4/27/2010 9:35:35 PM

Mordecai
Veteran
209 Posts
user info
edit post

^^ i definitely could have worded this question better but they are both justified yes.....but i was asking which is more justified

4/27/2010 9:37:40 PM

crazy_carl
All American
4073 Posts
user info
edit post

athletes for sure, they are much more likely to get hurt badly, and their careers are usually a lot shorter (ok most actors have just a few movies then they fade into obscurity, but not the ones demanding 25mil)

4/27/2010 9:39:15 PM

Spontaneous
All American
27372 Posts
user info
edit post

It seems like being a pro athlete is something you have to be born into, at the very least having a genetic propensity towards height.

Anybody can become an actor. It's just a popularity contest.

4/27/2010 9:42:53 PM

AndyMac
All American
31924 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"WHATEVER, you're not giving credit to my point, which is THOSE ATHLETES AND MOVIE STARS ARE THE PEOPLE WHO SLACK OFF IN MY CLASS AND DO NOTHING AND DROP OUT OF SCHOOL SO THEY CAN GO ON FOR YEARS ABOUT TEACHERS WHO NEVER UNDERSTOOD THEIR CREATIVITY OR THEIR PROWESS ON THE FIELD/COURT WHEN REALLY THEY WERE LAZY AND ANNOYING MOST OF THE TIME ANYWAY."


Yeah but you can take solace in the fact that 99% of those people who slack off in class never amount to anything.

They end up working at mcdonadls making, at most, twice as much as you

4/27/2010 9:49:01 PM

traub
All American
1857 Posts
user info
edit post

4/27/2010 9:51:51 PM

Spontaneous
All American
27372 Posts
user info
edit post

lol

4/27/2010 9:53:33 PM

MrsCake
All American
1146 Posts
user info
edit post

AndyMac, I'm declaring you the winner of this thread in my heart.

4/27/2010 10:01:04 PM

 Message Boards » Chit Chat » Which is more justified ? Page [1] 2, Next  
go to top | |
Admin Options : move topic | lock topic

© 2025 by The Wolf Web - All Rights Reserved.
The material located at this site is not endorsed, sponsored or provided by or on behalf of North Carolina State University.
Powered by CrazyWeb v2.39 - our disclaimer.