message_topic.aspx?topic=596964&page=1
6/18/2010 3:09:55 PM
... clearly, we needed another thread to discuss this. the one *IN* FF wasn't enough, already.
6/18/2010 3:12:20 PM
This isn't to discuss the matter. It's to draw attention to the fact that there is a thread that should be read, in case anyone has managed to miss it (e.g., not visiting FF in the first place)
6/18/2010 3:13:32 PM
This is retarded.Age is an arbitrary number anyway.
6/18/2010 3:14:07 PM
You can see that shit in a JC Penny's catalogue
6/18/2010 3:16:09 PM
... i thought they stopped publishing those?
6/18/2010 3:17:12 PM
lol, what a douche.
6/18/2010 3:18:16 PM
.[Edited on June 18, 2010 at 3:25 PM. Reason : nevermind]
6/18/2010 3:18:25 PM
if you all want to protect some middle aged man's right to post images of underage girls knock yourself out, i don't think this site should allow anything questionablebut it's no surprise hambrosia has no moral objections to this
6/18/2010 3:41:56 PM
^I bet by all your bitching and moaning a lot more people have seen the photo in question. Good job circulating that one all around...
6/18/2010 3:53:12 PM
LET'S ATTRACT ATTENTION TO TWW, GOOD OR BAD, K
6/18/2010 3:54:38 PM
that guy is probably some crazy christian zealot
6/18/2010 4:03:01 PM
so anyone against using underage eastern european girls as models for perverts is a christian zealot, got it.
6/18/2010 4:06:08 PM
speaking of pussy
6/18/2010 4:23:32 PM
hey m52ncsu go jerk it to miley cyrus
6/18/2010 4:26:02 PM
You're pretty uptight about this particular photo. Do you know this girl?If so, you think you could hook me up with a BJ?
6/18/2010 4:26:21 PM
Wouldn't one have to do some heavy digging to determine if this chick was eastern european?
6/18/2010 4:27:45 PM
Have you even taken a moment to look at the website that the photo is from? It's not even a nude site and:18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement All individuals that appear in any visual depiction of actual or simulated sexual conduct contained in this website were eighteen (18) years of age or older at the time of the creation or such depictions. The records required by 18 U.S.C. 2257 and 28 C.F.R. 75 with respect to visual depictions of actual sexually explicit conduct made on or after July 3, 1995 are kept by the Custodian of Records: Some of the aforementioned depictions appearing or otherwise contained in or at this website contain only visual depictions of actual sexually explicit conduct made before July 3, 1995, and, as such, are exempt from the requirements set forth in 18 U.S.C. 2257 and 28 C.F.R. 75
6/18/2010 4:31:43 PM
^^or that she is, in fact, underage[Edited on June 18, 2010 at 4:32 PM. Reason : a]
6/18/2010 4:31:47 PM
m52ncsu is like that idiot prosecutor that tried to charge a guy with child porn because he had a little lupe video in his airline luggage, and it required lupe herself to fly down to testify and show her passport before they would withdraw the charges
6/18/2010 4:32:59 PM
I betcha that it wouldn't take very long to verify the girl's age.
6/18/2010 4:33:18 PM
lol @ m52ncsu
6/18/2010 4:36:14 PM
This is what I was talking about by the way:http://www.thefrisky.com/post/246-porn-star-saves-dude-from-20-years-in-jail/
6/18/2010 4:37:22 PM
6/18/2010 4:42:32 PM
^^ yeah, that broad was on Stern a few weeks ago. I went to her website, and she doesn't even look that young to me
6/18/2010 4:45:33 PM
after my first post about removing the material i haven't been serious, no i didn't call the cops. you all get worked up so easily.
6/18/2010 5:00:24 PM
^^http://www.littlelupesite.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/little_lupe_kinky.jpg
6/18/2010 5:16:29 PM
6/18/2010 5:33:38 PM
fuck yeah little lupe is the fucking shitI'm AstralAdvent and i approved this message.
6/18/2010 6:00:38 PM
i think i see what the problem is here.m52ncsu's girlfriend found the link to the pic in his history, and flew into a jealous rage. she knows how he likes 'em.[Edited on June 18, 2010 at 7:07 PM. Reason : ]
6/18/2010 7:06:23 PM
today we are all underage
6/18/2010 7:11:32 PM
wait, isn't that Guth?also, why the fuck can't i find the uncensored shot of miley's vag that perez hilton posted
6/18/2010 11:00:25 PM
^^^ She has the look of someone that's been DP'd on multiple occasions.
6/18/2010 11:10:17 PM
^^I can't either
6/18/2010 11:44:02 PM
CC is not FF#2
6/19/2010 1:01:39 AM
I have waited the ENTIRE FUCKINGDAYfor someone to bring that!
6/19/2010 1:10:30 AM
6/19/2010 1:12:48 AM
banhammer should be dropped for over-pussification
6/19/2010 1:15:39 AM
I'm pretty sure its guth, er pooljobs...
6/19/2010 10:06:00 AM
that would explain a lot
6/19/2010 10:24:25 AM
lupe fuentes!
6/19/2010 10:28:37 AM
um yes. having read the initial thread i have to say that executed very poorly. very poorly.
6/19/2010 10:29:42 AM
6/19/2010 10:37:01 AM
6/19/2010 10:58:33 AM
^^ lol
6/19/2010 10:59:59 AM