11/8/2011 8:39:27 PM
It's for public safety. They didn't want all those people getting sick from eating your pizza.
11/8/2011 8:43:31 PM
fuck yo safety.freedom4life
11/8/2011 8:45:40 PM
11/8/2011 8:52:44 PM
11/8/2011 9:23:25 PM
I'm going to write a letter to the US Government to cover my losses from the last quarter of my life. It's only about 10k, I'm sure they can handle it.
11/8/2011 9:25:56 PM
Gotta keep Mount Trashmore pristine
11/8/2011 9:41:57 PM
^^ For real. If they're just handing money out they can handle my loans.
11/8/2011 9:45:40 PM
11/8/2011 9:47:54 PM
^In all seriousness, there are amendments to the first amendment.
11/8/2011 10:01:30 PM
the first amendment doesn't give you the right to "establish campgrounds" in the middle of a city
11/8/2011 11:15:19 PM
^ So it should be straight as long as they go sleep in the comfy beds in their heated homes every night and come back in the morning, right?I mean, that's pretty much easier for everyone.
11/8/2011 11:22:08 PM
11/8/2011 11:46:10 PM
It's bullshit.Mount Trashmore is actually pretty awesome. I'd definitely check it out if they get a permit for there.
11/9/2011 12:13:38 AM
What? the opening post says Virginia Beach denied having it there.
11/9/2011 12:25:07 AM
That doesn't mean it'll never be there.
11/9/2011 1:56:03 AM
So you won't check it out if they go there without a permit?
11/9/2011 2:02:55 AM
11/9/2011 12:15:38 PM
Occupy Wall Street Now Occupying Courtrooms With First Amendment LawsuitsNow that Occupy Wall Street has grown from a handful of demonstrators taking over a Lower Manhattan park to spawn offshoots in cities around the U.S., the movement is now occupying courtrooms.The young movement has lawyered up and filed lawsuits asserting freedom of speech and assembly in federal courts in Cincinnati, Sacramento, Nashville, Dallas and Atlanta, to name a few places.http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/245255/20111108/occupy-wall-street-occupying-court-rooms-amendment.htm?cid=2WOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!
11/9/2011 12:16:26 PM
They didn't say they couldn't go there and protest. It just said they couldn't go there and setup a fucking campground on public property.People are getting tired of this shit.
11/9/2011 12:19:04 PM
Lol "getting tired of this shit"constitutional rights come before your "getting tired of this shit" The whole purpose of protesting PEACEFULLY is for you to "get tired of this shit" and make a change.WE'RE SICK AND TIRED OF OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS BEING TRAMPLED.
11/9/2011 12:27:35 PM
And I'm sick and tired of not being able to go into a park without some unwashed hippies with signs about hemp and some unintelligible shit scrawled on pieces of cardboard plopping up 50 ratty-ass old tents all about and strewing the place with garbage.My tax money goes to these places so I can enjoy them, not so some small subset of the population can basically set up a squatters tenement there.You want to go there and protest? Fine, have at it. But it ain't a fucking campground.^ I think you need to deal with the fact that it isn't a Motel 6 out there.[Edited on November 9, 2011 at 12:32 PM. Reason : *]
11/9/2011 12:30:29 PM
11/9/2011 12:33:14 PM
Your tax money is already $14Billion in the hole. That we PRIOR to any protests. So don't use that as an excuse.You don't have a constitutional right to walk in a park "without some unwashed hippies with signs about hemp and some unintelligible shit scrawled on pieces of cardboard plopping up 50 ratty-ass old tents all about and strewing the place with garbage."Do you see how the protesters will always win. We have the constitution on our side.
11/9/2011 12:33:28 PM
^^ Go take a look at the front lawn of the old courthouse in Charlotte, unless they've drastically cleaned it up.^ Do you have reading comprehension problems? The point is they can't take it over completely and use it as a campground. They can stay there all they want, WITHOUT the tents. You wanna camp? GO TO A CAMPGROUND.
11/9/2011 12:34:31 PM
public assembly is subject to time/place/manner restrictions.Supreme Ct. has said as such, on multiple occasions.
11/9/2011 12:36:06 PM
Dictating where you can and cannot assemble at what time is a violation of the first amendment.
11/9/2011 12:36:22 PM
Well then get yourself appointed to the Supreme Court and change it. Or shut the fuck up, whichever is easier.
11/9/2011 12:37:12 PM
sorry, but you're mistaken. ^^Government entities may make reasonable content-neutral restrictions on the time, place, and manner of a speech or assemblage, even in a traditional public forum. This action directly affects the rights of assembly, since a government entity may restrict the time and place where an assembly may take place, as well as the manner in which the assembly occurs. The restrictions must be reasonable and narrowly tailored to meet a significant government purpose. The government entity must also leave open ample channels for communication that interested parties wish to communicate.[Edited on November 9, 2011 at 12:38 PM. Reason : .]
11/9/2011 12:37:36 PM
11/9/2011 12:38:29 PM
Now you're just being obtuse.
11/9/2011 12:38:52 PM
You know I'm right. I don't know why you're fighting it.The constitution is the foundation of the country.
11/9/2011 12:39:49 PM
if you're so hell bent on being "right" and "making a change" then get off the internet, go outside, and join your fellow protestors in the effort to "win"arguing on the internet, special olympics, etc
11/9/2011 12:43:14 PM
GeniuSxBoY you're wrongwe should abide by the ORIGINAL documentI DIDN'T VOTE ON THOSE AMENDMENTSThe FOUNDERS would not let HIPSTERS CAMP OUT on public PROPERTY
11/9/2011 12:45:05 PM
I'm doing my part in the cause by raising awareness to my fellow slighted Americans of TWW.There are 300,000,000+ people in this country. It only takes a few in the government to change a policy for 300,000,000.It takes 300,000,000 to change a policy in the government.
11/9/2011 12:46:20 PM
how many of those 300,000,000 are in governmentcuz that makes it sound like a lot less people can change a policy in the govermentif just a few in the government can change a policy
11/9/2011 12:49:16 PM
All it takes is the president and congress to pass a law. Civics 101.
11/9/2011 12:50:06 PM
you're talking about 536 POLITICIANSwe're lucky they get anything done at allever
11/9/2011 12:52:16 PM
so which is it300,000,000 or a few?
11/9/2011 12:53:31 PM
536 < 300,000,000I fail to sympathize.
11/9/2011 12:53:43 PM
I changed a policy once[Edited on November 9, 2011 at 12:54 PM. Reason : and I'm only one person]
11/9/2011 12:54:41 PM
I'd be absolutely furious if I was still a citizen of NYC, what with these lazy bastards wasting millions of the city's money and negatively affecting tourism and local businesses. It's also beyond me how trying to construct a shanty town can be the least bit legal.I agree with the core message, but it's being given a negative spin by all the loonies. Nevermind they're protesting in the wrong location. Go to DC and make yourselves useful.
11/9/2011 12:55:11 PM
k
11/9/2011 12:55:34 PM
11/9/2011 12:55:40 PM
"k"i'm beaming, I just beat GeniuSxBoY
11/9/2011 12:57:52 PM
Are we really free?That is the question.
11/9/2011 12:58:25 PM
11/9/2011 1:00:02 PM
11/9/2011 1:03:31 PM
people should prob just go back to their lives. the Occupy movement isnt going to accomplish anything other then a bunch of wasted tax money
11/9/2011 1:06:16 PM
11/9/2011 1:08:18 PM